Comments on: correct attribution

By: Thomma Lyn

Thomma Lyn — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:15:33 +0000

I love the sense of movement in this poem. You do an amazing job of conveying motion with language.

By: benedictedelachanal

benedictedelachanal — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:02:17 +0000

I agree with you, you write and I draw for everyone. I was interested to read about the process in this poem. different mediums, similar techniques, same goal, transcription of an idea.

By: Gabrielle Bryden

Gabrielle Bryden — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:33:18 +0000

Just to clarify – I said that you had an insight into non-linear time (the comment is on Aletha’s blog).
Thanks, Gabrielle, I was enjoying having peculiar sight.

By: Aletha

Aletha — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:51:38 +0000

Thinking prosaically, I’m wishing I had some control over linear causality. Gabrielle said you have peculiar insight into the subject. Time is a strange medium in which to live; it’s the best we’ve got I suppose. Wonderful poem on the keen inner life of a little boy.
I have peculiar sight, Aletha. Thankyou, I’m glad you enjoyed the poem.

By: Paul Squires

Paul Squires — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:59:51 +0000

Cool, that was fun. Coming soon – Acknowledge your sources as both a spiritual concept and the key to survival, in terms of respecting your ancestors and the planet, and preserving the historical train of thought so humans don’t have to figure it all out again. Acknowledge your sources.

By: Gabrielle Bryden

Gabrielle Bryden — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:37:18 +0000

You do use some of your own words – I spy a ‘twirling’ and a ‘bewaring’ which appear to be paulologisms. Benedicte does some of the most luscious collages – you must have a look http://bendelachanal.wordpress.com/2009/09/30/collage/ if you haven’t already.
They are fantastic collages. How did those paulologisms get in there? Must be typos, whoops.